Compared to what I read on Gazzettino and was reported in this space (Coden), I would point out that the oaks are not 50, but 38, and that almost all homes and fences c ' were before them and not the other: they were not to disturb the growth of trees. Even people, a lot, c 'and had already started to have to deal with the hardships holm very soon: More than 15 years continuously calling for a solution. More than 15 years that the sidewalks are uneven. Only 12 years ago, that after 26 years of neglect, c 'was the first serious pruning and, I believe, also passed with a "medicinal" suitable. The road c 'was already too busy and it was 30 to 40 years ago. C 'had been, unfortunately, a' short-sighted administration, at least in its Public Works Department, who planted the oak too close to each other and along a street in central city, even in the suburbs, in a period where you could only imagine the svuluppo of buildings and traffic and an increase in population for the industrial and economic thrust of the time.
And the people of San Julian Street must pay for the shortsightedness of the past and myopia even now? And indeed, the oaks have "Ammastellati? Here, as the Central Government, chairs on the plots and ideas, just a really Mastella who "chooses the family" and a few oaks to fall all over? And people in Via San Giuliano dev 'to be faulted, when behind the village, towards the Noncello, c' is green space, intricate, and sterpizzato panteganizzato and that according to the rules of the City nor should there be? An area where waste water from private homes directly in the rain "Roia" going Noncello
... maybe we start to talk about the back of Amman Street and Alley San Giuliano. You never know ...
Superpippo
0 comments:
Post a Comment